Yet as a court considers the nature of an ownership interest, there is some risk that it will too readily shift the inquiry over to the issue of whether an alleged copy has infringed the asserted copyright.
The defendants argued that they were merely reporting on the research reports and were not infringing on the copyrights.
The order has been extended twice with the consent of the defendants that have appeared in the action and it will expire on May 13, 1995 at 5:00 p.
Guyot, , 143, 16 S.
Washington ton State Apple Advertising Comm'n, , 97 S.
Pogrebnoy claimed at trial to have received permission from the publisher of one newspaper, but his claim was rejected by the District Court at trial.